I manage ordering for a mid-sized equipment maintenance company. When I took over purchasing in 2020, one of the first big decisions I faced was whether to stick with Yanmar diesel engines for our equipment fleet or explore electric powertrain options. After 5 years of managing these relationships—roughly $400,000 annually across 12 vendors—here's what I've learned.
The comparison isn't as simple as 'diesel vs electric.' It's about three dimensions: total cost of ownership, reliability in your specific application, and the operational friction of switching. Let me walk through each.
This is where most people assume electric wins. And for some applications, it does. But the numbers surprised me.
For a typical Yanmar 4TNV98 diesel engine (4-cylinder, 50-70hp range):
For a comparable electric motor system (50-70hp equivalent):
Never expected the 'expensive' diesel option to beat electric on 5-year TCO. Turns out the battery replacement cost is the hidden killer. The surprise wasn't the energy cost difference—electric wins there. It was the capital cost of the battery system and its inevitable replacement.
My take: Electric wins on fuel/energy cost. Diesel wins on capital cost and lifespan if you plan to keep equipment beyond 5 years. For our fleet of skid steer loaders running 1,500-2,000 hours annually, Yanmar diesel makes better financial sense. Your mileage may vary if you have shorter operating cycles or subsidies for electric equipment.
I've only worked with Yanmar diesel engines across about 40 units in our fleet. My experience is based on mid-range construction equipment. I can't speak to how this applies to marine applications, but I've gathered enough insight from dealer conversations.
Here's what I've found:
The surprise wasn't that diesel requires more maintenance. It's that the consequences of neglecting maintenance are more predictable with diesel. You see oil pressure drop, you hear knock, you catch it early. With electric, battery degradation is slow and invisible until you suddenly can't complete a day's work.
My take: If you have experienced mechanics who understand diesel, stick with it. The training cost to switch to electric maintenance isn't trivial. Our shop has been rebuilding Yanmar engines for 15 years. Electric would require new diagnostic equipment and training. That's an operational friction most cost comparisons ignore.
Yanmar's product range is a strength here. They make engines for skid steer loaders, excavators, tractors, marine vessels, and generators. You can standardize on one brand across diverse equipment. That simplifies parts inventory—one brand of fuel filters, one brand of oil filters, one catalog to reference.
For a Yanmar skid steer loader (V70, V85 series), the diesel engine is well-matched to the duty cycle: high torque at low RPM, ability to run full throttle for hours without overheating, and easy cold starts. For a 6-cylinder marine diesel in a 37-foot fishing boat, the same reliability story applies but with added consideration for corrosion resistance and saltwater operation.
Electric makes sense when your application has predictable duty cycles, access to charging infrastructure, and noise/emissions restrictions. In our line of work—construction sites and industrial facilities—we can't guarantee any of those.
If you're like me—processing 60-80 orders annually, managing relationships with 8 vendors for different needs—here's what you actually need to think about:
Final thought: I'm not anti-electric. For certain applications—indoor equipment, short-haul vehicles, noise-sensitive areas—electric makes perfect sense. But for our heavy-use construction equipment running thousands of hours annually, Yanmar diesel remains the pragmatic choice. The calculation changes every year as battery prices drop. So check your numbers annually. What was true in 2020 when I started is constantly evolving.
Tell us your jobsite dimensions and digging requirements — we will recommend the optimal model.
Ask an Expert